www.KevinPerelmanTarget.com

The Right to Proper Council

California Penal Code § 182 – Conspiracy

Summary:

Why is the PERELMAN family FORCING criminal Jewish Lawyers on my with their Judge Friends, Dr Steve Levinson following me to the Car Groups, with his Judicial Family, and Bail Bond friends. In a mass operation to eradicate at all costs with empty label jusitifcatons and the criminal Psychology Community friends?

And a Judicial Aiding and Abetting Crime Ring. This starts at 5 years old.

This law makes it a crime for two or more people to conspire to commit a crime, or to falsely prosecute or frame someone through unlawful means, even if the crime doesn’t actually occur, as long as there’s an overt act taken in furtherance of the conspiracy.

🔧 Key Elements:

To prove a criminal conspiracy under PC §182:

1. Agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime;
2. Intent to commit that crime;
3. An overt act committed by one or more parties to advance the conspiracy.

🧩 How It Applies to Refusal to Impeach Witnesses

If multiple actors (e.g., officers, prosecutors, defense attorneys, or witnesses) are working together to:

• Protect false testimony
• Suppress exculpatory evidence (like stalking video, witness credibility issues, parking ticket timestamp, etc.)
• Refuse to impeach obviously discredited or provable-false witnesses
• Obstruct a fair trial

…and there is clear or circumstantial evidence of coordination or pattern, then it could fall under PC §182 as a conspiracy to obstruct justice, suppress evidence, or even falsely imprison you.

Kevin Perelman

26500 Agoura Rd, Ste 102

Calabasas, CA 91302

312-259-3686

10/17/2025

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR

The People of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Kevin Perelman,

Defendant and Appellant.

Case No. B343120

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF NEW COUNSEL

(REQUEST FOR SUBSTITUTION OF APPOINTED ATTORNEY)

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT:

Defendant and Appellant Kevin Perelman respectfully moves this Court for the

appointment of new appellate counsel. This motion is based on the following grounds:

Right to Effective, Conflict-Free Counsel:

Pursuant to the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 15 of the California Constitution, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right…to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.”

California law requires that appointed counsel must provide effective and conflict-free assistance at all critical stages of the proceedings. (People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118; California Penal Code § G87.2.)

Grounds for Substitution:

A defendant is entitled to new counsel if there is a conflict of interest, a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship, ineffective assistance, or loss of trust or confidence in current counsel. (See Marsden, supra; People v. Smith (1993) 6 Cal.4th 684, 696; People v.

Ortiz (1990) 51 Cal.3d 975.)

Specific Basis for Request:

Appellant has experienced a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship, “failure to investigate/appellate issues, conflicts of interest, lack of communication, and loss of trust”.

See Attachment Letter:

Request for Hearing:

Appellant requests that the Court conduct a hearing to consider this request for substitution of counsel, as required by People v. Marsden, supra.

WHEREFORE, for the reasons stated above, Appellant respectfully requests:

• • That the Court grant this motion,
  • That new appellate counsel be appointed, and
  • For any other relief the Court deems just and proper. Respectfully submitted,

Kevin Perelman, Appellant

Legal Authority

• • Sixth Amendment, U.S. Constitution; Cal. Const., Art. I, § 15
  • Cal. Penal Code §§ 987, 987.2
  • People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118
  • People v. Smith (1993) 6 Cal.4th 684, 696–697
  • People v. Ortiz (1990) 51 Cal.3d 975

Letter

To California Appellate Project Refusal Acknowledge My Requests

Kevin Perelman

26500 Agoura Rd, Ste 102

Calabasas, CA 91302

312-259-3686

10/16/2025

California Appellate Project – Los Angeles

Attn: Executive Director Jennifer Peabody (or Supervising Attorney) 520 S. Grand Ave, 4th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071 Phone: (213) 243-0300

Fax: (213) 243-0303

Email: Capdocs@lacap.com

Re: Request for Appointment of New Appellate Counsel and Formal Complaint – Case No. B343120

To Whom It May Concern:

I urgently reiterate my request for the appointment of new appellate counsel and submit this formal complaint regarding the ongoing mishandling and oversight of my appeal, Case No. B343120.

Conflict of Interest, Prejudice, and Attorney Selection Concerns

My trial attorney, Shep Alan Zebberman (#155478), was privately retained and provided

ineffective assistance of counsel. My current appellate counsel, Yisrael Gelb (#344924), is a rabbi and presents a clear religious identity. I am Jewish myself, but I have observed a troubling pattern in which nearly all attorneys assigned to me—either by the courts or CAP—share the same tight-knit community affiliation, sometimes with visible religious leadership roles. This pattern raises concerns that attorney selection, rather than being

impartial and neutral, may be influenced by factors risking divided loyalty and bias. I firmly believe that religion and law should remain strictly separate in professional legal

assignment. I request oversight and transparency to ensure fairness and diversity in attorney assignment.

Inexperience of Appointed Counsel

Yisrael Gelb, according to state bar records, has only been licensed for approximately two years. This minimal experience is deeply concerning, as my appeal involves complex

constitutional issues, alleged judicial and prosecutorial misconduct, and a significant

impact on my future. It is simply not appropriate for a case with these stakes to be assigned to an attorney this inexperienced.

Omission from CAP-LA Directory

Upon reviewing the official CAP-LA staff/panel listing (see Attachment 1), I found that Mr. Gelb does not appear as a staff or recognized panel attorney. I respectfully request an explanation of how he was assigned and whether standard CAP-LA procedures have been followed.

Lack of Notice or Communication

For the record, I have never received any official notice, written correspondence, or other communication by mail regarding the appointment or substitution of appellate counsel, relevant deadlines, or any related matters in this case from CAP-LA or the court.

All information I have obtained has come from my own online docket research or direct

inquiry. This highlights a serious breakdown in due process and communication affecting my rights.

CAP-LA Communication (Rick Lennon Email) and Inferred Denial of New Counsel Attachment 2 is an email from Rick Lennon of CAP-LA, dated September 14, 2025. While Mr. Lennon does not expressly deny my request for new counsel, he makes it clear that CAP-LA intends to keep Mr. Gelb on my case despite my repeated, written objections. The substance of the email disregards my concerns about conflict of interest, the importance of habeas expertise, and procedural fairness.

Case Docket Irregularities

Attachment 3 contains screenshots of the state court docket showing a “replace appointed counsel” notice dated 10/15/2025. I was never contacted by a new attorney, no

substitution took place, and there are proofs of service filed with dates set in the future (see Attachment 4). This raises further concerns about transparency, accuracy, and

reliability in my case record.

Systemic Pattern and History in Prior Cases

This is not the first time I have experienced such issues in Los Angeles County. I have had two prior criminal cases—Case No. 3PY03498 and Case No. 7VW04099—where similar problems occurred. Lawyers with community or religious ties, or a disposition toward prejudice or coordinated adverse action, resulted in unfair or ineffective representation. I respectfully submit that these repeated problems indicate a broader, systemic issue with how representation is being assigned and overseen in my matters. (See Attachment 5 for detailed summary.)

Comprehensive Record of Documented Complaints and Habeas Petition

In addition, please see:

• Attachment 6: My initial written request for new counsel (August 4, 2025), which has not been addressed, and a record that an opening statement was filed on 10/13/2025 instead.
• Attachment 7: Statement of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, summarizing my legal arguments and supporting evidence.
• Attachment 8: Ineffective Assistance, Misconduct C Corruption Statement – Trial Judicial Misconduct – Notes, providing additional detail on courtroom and systemic misconduct.

Request for Immediate Action

For all these reasons, I respectfully and urgently request:

• Immediate appointment of new appellate counsel, independent from prior

attorneys, fully vetted, and with no close community or religious ties to previous defenders.

• Written clarification of CAP-LA’s process for assigning Mr. Gelb to my case, why his name does not appear on your staff/panel directory, and what supervisor-level

review (if any) has been conducted.

• Assurance that no actions are taken in my appellate matter until impartial, conflict- free, and sufficiently experienced counsel has been assigned, and a supervisor has confirmed full review and corrective action in my file.

Thank you for your immediate attention. Please ensure this letter and all supporting attachments are made part of my official appellate file. I respectfully request a formal, written response as soon as practicable.

Attachments:

1. CAP-LA Attorney/Staff Directory, October 2025 printout
2. Email from Rick Lennon (CAP-LA), September 14, 2025
3. Appellate court docket screenshots (“replace appointed counsel”)
4. Proof of Service Date 10/20/2025 instead of 10/15/2025 inconsistencies
5. Criminal cases (now including 3PY03498 and 7VW04099)
6. Prior request for reassignment of appellate counsel (August 4, 2025)
7. Statement of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
8. Ineffective Assistance, Misconduct C Corruption Statement – Trial Judicial Misconduct – Notes

Sincerely,

Kevin Perelman

Attachment 1

CAP-LA Attorney/Staff Directory, October 2025 printout

Attachment 2

Email from Rick Lennon (CAP-LA), September 14, 2025

Attachment 3

Appellate court docket screenshots (“replace appointed counsel”)

Attachment 4

Proof of Service Date 10/20/2025 instead of 10/15/2025 inconsistencies

Attachment 1

criminal cases (now including 3PY03498 and 7VW04099)

Van Nuys Courthouse Cases with Judicial Misconduct: criminal cases:

3PY03498

7VW04099

Attachment 6

Prior request for reassignment of appellate counsel (August 4, 2025)

To

California Appellate Project

Phone: Phone: (213) 243-0300

Fax: (213) 243-0303

August 4, 2025

Email:Capdocs@lacap.com AppellateBranch@pubdef.lacounty.gov

Adress: 520 South Grand Avenue, 4th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071

To Whom It May Concern:

The People v. Kevin Perelman, Case No. B343120 Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Four

Dear Supervising Attorney,

I am writing to formally request the reassignment of new appellate counsel in my case, The People v. Kevin Perelman, Case No. B343120, currently before the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Four.

I have serious concerns about a potential conflict of interest that could affect my representation. While my current appointed appellate attorney has not acknowledged any conflict, I feel there is a strong likelihood of one due to community affiliations and the circumstances of my case. Both my previous trial attorney and the current appellate attorney are members of the same small, close- knit community (the Jewish community), and my current appellate attorney is also a Rabbi. I am concerned these community connections may create both the appearance and reality of divided loyalty, and possibly an unwillingness to fully pursue claims involving another member of the same community.

Additionally, I am concerned about my appointed appellate attorney’s limited experience (approximately two years since passing the bar), which I believe is insufficient for a case of this seriousness and complexity. As an inexperienced lawyer, he may not possess the necessary knowledge or familiarity with habeas corpus proceedings. He has told me directly that he believes he is limited to what is included in the trial transcripts and docket, even though filing a writ of habeas corpus is often necessary to address ineffective assistance of counsel based on facts outside the transcript and docket.

It is especially important to note that my case may also involve significant judicial and prosecutorial misconduct. My concerns include, but are not limited to, fraudulent police reports, improper investigative practices, potential bias or unfair treatment from both the prosecution and the trial court, and witnesses conspiring with police in illegal operations. I am deeply concerned that these issues have substantially impacted the integrity and fairness of my trial, and that they warrant careful and impartial review on appeal. I believe my current appellate counsel is not adequately positioned, either in terms of experience or independence, to thoroughly investigate and argue these matters, especially where those issues involve or are intertwined with claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.

For these reasons, I respectfully request that a new appellate attorney —one with no prior professional or personal association with my previous legal counsel, not a member of the same religious or social network, and who is highly experienced with both direct appeals and habeas corpus claims—be assigned to handle my appeal. It is critically important to me that my appellate representation is impartial and fully qualified to pursue all necessary legal remedies, including direct challenges to judicial or prosecutorial misconduct and the involvement of witnesses in illegal conduct.

I trust that you will carefully review my concerns and take timely action to ensure fair representation as required by law. Thank you for your attention to this urgent and sensitive matter.

Sincerely, Kevin Perelman

Kevin Perelman

Appellant

26500 Agoura Rd, STE 102

Calabasas, Ca 91302

312-259-3686

Kevin@KevinPerelman.com

Attachment 7

Statement of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

To

California Appellate Project

Phone: Phone: (213) 243-0300

Fax: (213) 243-0303

Email:Capdocs@lacap.com AppellateBranch@pubdef.lacounty.gov Adress: 520 South Grand Avenue, 4th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071

To Whom It May Concern:

The People v. Kevin Perelman, Case No. B343120 Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Four

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Ground: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel — Presentation of New and Extrinsic Evidence

1. Petitioner’s Claim: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Petitioner, Kevin Perelman, respectfully seeks habeas corpus relief based on egregious ineffective assistance of counsel by Shep Zebberman, as demonstrated by facts both in and outside the trial record. This claim is supported by the following:

1. Legal Standard (Strickland v. Washington) Relief is warranted when:
   1. Counsel’s performance was constitutionally deficient;
   2. There is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result would have been different.
2. Statement of Facts C New Extrinsic Evidence

Discriminatory and Prejudicial Conduct

• • • Shep Zebberman made prejudiced statements and failed to advocate for me due to personal and community bias, as described in my declaration and corroborated by third-party witnesses and community records.

Failure to Investigate, Prepare and Present Defense

• • • Did not review or present extensive video evidence of mobbing, vandalism, and ongoing harassment in conspiring methods and events with LAPD.
    • Refused to meet with me to discuss my side of events, relying solely on prosecution evidence.

Failure to Investigate or Call Available Witnesses

• • • Never investigated, interviewed, or subpoenaed witnesses who could have testified on my behalf, including:
• Eyewitnesses to harassment, vandalism, and provocation;
• Neighbors and community members familiar with false allegations by Officer Dinse, Terrance Scroggins, Pedram Espinoza, and others;
• Victims of Officer Dinse’s similar misconduct (e.g., federal lawsuit by Rex Schillenberger);
• Experts in police procedure and community mobbing.

Failure to hire or consult with any private investigator who could have

interviewed witnesses, gathered additional exculpatory statements, or tracked social media campaigns against me.

• • Evidence: Declarations from available witnesses, statements from those never

contacted by defense, my own sworn declaration, investigator reports (if available), and a list of potential witnesses with what their testimony would have shown.

• • Failure to introduce events of police harassments, intimidation, as well as witness harassment, intimidation, before and during the trial.

Failure to File Key Motions and Argue Self-Defense

• • • Did not file a Pitchess motion against Officer Dinse, despite his documented history of similar misconduct.
    • Refused to argue self-defense even with documentary/video evidence of years-long provocation by community and police.
    • Did not challenge fabricated restitution claims or expose documented blackmail efforts by prosecution witnesses. Working with their friends in the court house to pose as FBI agents for intimidation.

Conflict of Interest s Coercion Toward Insanity Plea

• • • Prioritized relationships with trial judges over client defense.
    • Pressured me to accept Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGI) without legal/medical basis.

Failure to Seek Change of Venue or Protect Against Community Harassment

• • • Ignored repeated, documented attempts by Officer Dinse and neighborhood watch to incite community bias, including via Facebook and public statements.
    • Did not move to change venue despite mass prejudice, nor did he advise or assist with seeking restraining orders against harassers.

Failure to Impeach Prosecution Witnesses

• • • Did not challenge (impeach) perjured or contradictory testimony from key

witnesses, and did not present readily available impeachment material (videos, letters, reports).

Failure to Protect Defendant from Direct Courtroom Intimidation

• • • Did not object or seek mistrial when individuals impersonating FBI agents appeared in the courtroom with Prosecutor Orbelli to intimidate me in the

presence of the judge and jury—egregious misconduct designed to prejudice my defense, create an unfair environment, and reinforce false government narratives.

• • • Failed to raise the issue of prosecutorial collusion with these individuals and did not seek judicial intervention or police report to expose this unlawful intimidation tactic.
    • Evidence: My declaration, affidavits from anyone who witnessed or heard about the “FBI” presence, court security reports, and any correspondence with court staff about these incidents.

G. Additional Examples of Evidence Outside the Trial Record

• Newly available police records or Bar complaints showing patterns of misconduct not included in trial evidence.
• Social media posts by Officer Dinse or others, including deleted/archived content recovered through subpoenas.
• Expert opinions now available but not sought by defense (e.g., on police procedure, mobbing, prejudice).

1. Prejudice: Strickland Standard Satisfied Because of the above errors:

• The jury never heard or saw critical exculpatory evidence or witness testimony that would have undermined the prosecution’s case.
• Lack of a private investigator, lack of witness interviews, and failure to object to intimidation fundamentally denied me a fair trial.
• The outcome would likely have been different had defense counsel met even minimal professional standards.

1. Prayer for Relief and Request for Evidentiary Hearing

Petitioner respectfully requests:

• 1. An order to show cause and/or evidentiary hearing to receive this new, extrinsic evidence.
  2. Vacation of conviction and/or outright dismissal due to cumulative constitutional error.

1. Evidence to be Attached (Example)

• Declaration of Kevin Perelman (listing all witnesses I requested or identified, complaints re: FBI impersonators, failure to investigate)
• Declarations/affidavits from uninvestigated witnesses, neighbors, and potential experts
• Affidavit from (or record of attempted contact with) a private investigator, if available
• Videos and audio not introduced at trial
• Screenshots/archived copies of relevant Facebook/social posts
• Security/court incident reports regarding presence of FBI agents or intimidation efforts
• Insurance, restitution, and any financial records relating to blackmail/extortion claims
• Copies of relevant Bar complaints, police records, or civil complaints

Attachment 8

Trial Judicial Misconduct – Notes

To

California Appellate Project

Phone: Phone: (213) 243-0300

Fax: (213) 243-0303

Email:Capdocs@lacap.com AppellateBranch@pubdef.lacounty.gov Adress: 520 South Grand Avenue, 4th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071

To Whom It May Concern:

The People v. Kevin Perelman, Case No. B343120 Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Four

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and courtroom misconduct – Shep Zebberman Specific Accusations:

• Discriminatory and Prejudicial Comments
• Sheps Statement to me, right before the verdict “You might get away with this” Showing from day one, he was acting as a judge, not a Lawyer. And was never going to represent me fairly and was involved in a conspiracy to lock me away no matter how innocent. No matter how much proof. He wasn’t even going to try to prove my innocence.
• Everything asked he give an opposite answer, and disinformation, showing anger. I asked about change of venue. like change of venue, he lied stating their was not

grounds for. While was friends with a lot of the Judges. Being provoked and harassed by witness Terrance Scroggins during trial. Would not help with filing restraining

orders or use the information to show in the court at any time that Terrance was always the aggressor or impeach the witnesses properly jumping from lawyer to lawyer.

– Penal Code § 147: Willful deprivation of a client’s rights

Failure to Investigate/Prepare/Defend

• Did not review Kevin’s exculpatory video evidence or ask for Kevin’s version of events. – Relied on fabricated reports and prosecution narrative. – Penal Code § 1054.G: Failure to seek or present exculpatory evidence

Failure to File Key Motions

• Judge Dohi, refused to file Pitchess motion for LAPD Officer Charles Sean Dinse, despite Dinse’s federal lawsuits for similar behavior. – Would not request change of venue or move for mistrial, nor file dismissal. Even with the events happening in the court room – Penal

Code § 1054.5: Withholding of motions/evidence

Conflict of Interest

• Admitted being friends with Judge Gregory A. Dohi and Judge Stephen Marcus, failed to zealously advocate for client. – Potentially took $50,000 under false pretenses (with

influence from Arnold Silber, Kevin’s stepfather). – Penal Code § 182(a)(5): Conspiracy to obstruct justice

Coercion Toward Insanity Plea (NGI)

• Tried to pressure client to plead NGI to “get you out of this,” abusing attorney’s

power/trust. Stating “I can get you out of this” I know some Psychology People – Business s Professions Code § 6068: Duty to act with honesty and loyalty

Refusal to Provide Self-Defense Argument

• Refused to present documented mobbing/stalking history; said self-defense not possible for vandalism despite clear evidence of gangstalking and conspiracy amongst mass

stalking groups with LAPD with an Agenda to setup or frame the defendant. – Penal Code § 6G2-6G4: Legitimacy of self-defense argument

Judicial Corruption s Misconduct Specific Accusations:

• • Bias and Prejudice
• Judge Stephen Marcus: “I’ll squeeze you out of your place.”
• Judge Gregory A. Dohi: Fabricated mental health diagnoses, belittled and intimidated

defendant (“Come on down!”) treating court rooms and trials like fun game shows, denied defense motions for Pitchess; colluded in systemic prejudice.

• Penal Code § G6 s G6.5: Judicial officers acting corruptly, maliciously, or with conflict of interest

Van Nuys Court Reporter who owns property adjoining my wall Misconduct – Debbie Wollman

• Spread false rumors about Kevin’s mental health to court staff and judges; owned

property adjoining defendant (conflict of interest). – Omitted critical exculpatory phrases from transcripts (e.g., “Every Miata is modified”). – Penal Code § 134: Preparing false

evidence (tampered transcript) – Penal Code § 182: Conspiracy

Police Corruption – Officer Charles Sean Dinse Specific Accusations:

• • History of Lawsuits and Misconduct
• Used Facebook to incite neighborhood harassment against Kevin; earlier federally sued by Rex Schillenberger.
• Publicly posted “How do we FORCE people into mental facilities,” inciting community intimidation/hate/Stalking groups.
• Penal Code § 182: Conspiracy to violate civil rights
• Penal Code § 135: Destroying/concealing evidence

Fabrication of Claims and Evidence

• Lied about Kevin following him with Prosecutor Orbell to use as amo for increased

sentencing, staged incidents to provoke legal trouble. – Seized art computer (falsely called a “hard drive”), made misleading claims about data. – Penal Code § 118: Perjury – Penal Code § 141: Planting/tampering with evidence

Intimidation and Collusion

• Orchestrated use of “fake FBI agents” to intimidate Kevin in courtroom right before trial day. – Colluded with Prosecutors Lisa Orbelli and Detective Ruiz, and Charles Sean Dinse.
• Penal Code § 136.1: Witness/victim intimidation – Penal Code § 182: Conspiracy

Witness and Community Misconduct

Specific Accusations:

• • Terrance Scroggins (Neighbor/Witness):
• Engaged in continuous harassment/provocation before and during the trial(240+ videos), staged vandalisms with neighbors, Provokings, submitted false restitution claims (colluded with USAA Insurance to repaint entire car, then sought extra $5,000 after USAA paid for

repairs).

• Left blackmail threats in writing demanding DIRECT restitution money.
• Penal Code § 518: Extortion
• Penal Code § 118: Perjury

Pedram Espinoza (Neighbor/Witness):

• Provided knowingly false testimony about his time at the property and his encounters with Kevin. – Penal Code § 118: Perjury. No impeaching the witness with Pedram on video stating I’m not allowed at my townhouse complex. Or that I take pictures of kids. Showing he’s defaming my name and has motive to get rid of me. Shep kept the argument in the

context to make it look like I was loitering around his house, in the common areas of our complex. A Juror had to ask the Judge how long I lived their he picked up one the one sided stories.

Community Members (“Yosi,” Jason Ryan Fishman, etc.):

• Participated in organized surveillance/harassment; repeated slander (“not a real Jew,” “mentally ill”), acted at direction of Officer Dinse and neighborhood watch. – Penal Code §

653.2: Electronic/cyber harassment – Penal Code § 182: Conspiracy to harass. Showing linked events within the Jewish Community.

Prosecutorial Misconduct Specific Accusations:

• Lisa Orbelli s Detective Ruiz (Prosecutors):
• Collaborated with police and witnesses to create “incidents” for prosecution; made false claims and permitted intimidation tactics in and around the courthouse.
• Permitted/introduced false evidence, allowed staged intimidation (fake FBI agents and courthouse staff).
• Penal Code § 118: Subornation of perjury
• Penal Code § 182: Conspiracy
• Penal Code § G6.5: Misconduct by officers of the court

Transcript, Records, and Restitution Tampering Specific Accusations:

• • Omitted or altered evidence/testimony in trial transcripts (Debbie Wollman).
  • Docket/minute orders contained unexplained errors or clerical manipulation (split sentence, “no probation” issues), possibly at the direction of corrupt clerks and neighbor/court reporter Debbie Wollman.
  • Restitution awarded based on fraudulent insurance claims and blackmail tactics (Terrance Scroggins).
  • Penal Code § 134: Preparing false documentary evidence
  • Penal Code § 115: Filing false instruments

Overarching Constitutional and Civil Rights Violations Specific Accusations:

• • Constitutional:
• Denial of due process (U.S. Const. Amend. XIV)
• Denial of effective assistance/counsel (U.S. Const. Amend. VI; Strickland v. Washington)
• Denial of fair trial and equal protection (California Const. Art. I, §§ 7, 15)

Pattern of Systemic Government Abuse:

• Collusion among judges, defense, prosecutors, police, and community.
• Tampering, intimidation, and long-term targeting that makes fair retrial impossible.
• Penal Code § 182: Criminal conspiracy
• Civil Remedies: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (federal civil rights suit for deprivation of rights under color of law)

Judicial Corruption—Grounds for Dismissal Overlooked

• • Repeated Judicial Bias:
• Judge Stephen Marcus made overtly hostile comments toward Defendant (“I’ll squeeze you out of your place”), demonstrating clear personal animosity and prejudice contrary to impartial adjudication required by law.
• Judge Gregory Dohi fabricated “mental illness” labels for Defendant with no clinical basis, belittled Defendant during proceedings, and denied valid defense motions (e.g., Pitchess motion for Officer Dinse), demonstrating pattern of prejudiced rulings.

Legal Basis: Judicial bias and partial are grounds for mistrial or dismissal:

• *Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.*, 556 U.S. 868 (2009) (extreme judicial bias may violate due process).
• Cal. Penal Code § 96, § 96.5 (corrupt conduct by judicial officers).

Court Reporter Misconduct s Transcript Tampering:

• Debbie Wollman, with a direct conflict of interest, fabricated negative mental health rumors about Defendant to judges and staff, and altered the official record (omitting

exculpatory testimony such as “Every Miata is modified”). Legal Basis: Cal. Penal Code § 134 (preparing false evidence), § 182 (conspiracy to pervert justice).

Police Officer Corruption—Grounds for Dismissal Overlooked

• • Officer Charles Sean Dinse’s Documented Corruption:
• Used his Facebook account to incite community mobbing (“How do we FORCE people into mental facilities”), was previously federally sued for similar actions.
• Lied under oath about Defendant following him with Prosecutor Orbelli for increased

sentencing, fabricated incidents, and seized Defendant’s computer misrepresenting both its contents and evidentiary value.

• Regularly engaged in provocation and intimidation designed to escalate Defendant’s legal peril.

Legal Basis:

• Cal. Penal Code § 118 (perjury), § 141 (evidence tampering), § 182 (conspiracy), § 147 (officials depriving rights).
• Cal. Evidence Code § 1043 et seq. (Pitchess motion—officer history of dishonesty/abuse is grounds for discovery, impeachment, and, where egregious, dismissal).

Prosecutorial Misconduct—Compelling Grounds for Dismissal Ignored

• • Fabrication, Coll, and Use of False Evidence:
• Prosecutors Lisa Orbelli and Detective Ruiz collaborated with Dinse, Scroggins and others, knowingly presenting false or uninvestigated claims to the court.
• Prosecutors enabled and facilitated courtroom intimidation—including the appearance of people posing as FBI agents during trial—creating an atmosphere of threat and

unlawfulness.

• Prosecutors injected irrelevant hearsay and prejudicial evidence into the record, repeatedly straying from the charges to paint Defendant as dangerous or unstable, manipulating judicial perception and deliberation.

Legal Basis:

• *People v. Batts* (2003) 30 Cal.4th 660, 693 (dismissal appropriate in egregious government misconduct).
• Cal. Penal Code § 118 (subornation of perjury), § 182 (conspiracy), § 96.5 (prosecutorial misconduct).

Admission of Hearsay/Irrelevant Allegations:

• Prosecutors repeatedly introduced and relied on one sided prejudicial statements and hearsay incidents—statements, rumors, alleged threats, and unrelated community disputes—irrelevant to the charged offenses, used solely to inflame and manipulate the judge and jury. – Defense counsel failed to object or move to strike these prejudicial and

improper references, compounding the miscarriage of justice. Legal Basis: – Cal. Evidence Code § 1200 (hearsay inadmissibility), – *People v. Fuiava* (2012) 53 Cal.4th 622

(admission of repeated, irrelevant misconduct evidence is reversible error).

Cumulative Misconduct Clearly Justified Dismissal

• • Pattern of Collusion:
• Combined judicial, police, and prosecutorial bias, evidenced by intimidation, tampering, and fabrication, destroyed any pretense of fair trial.
• Egregious conduct rises to the constitutional standard where “the only appropriate remedy is dismissal,” as retrial would merely replicate injustice.

Missed Opportunities for Relief:

• At each stage—pretrial (based on evidence fabrication/transcript tampering), during trial (judicial bias, police perjury, prosecutorial hearsay, intimidation), and post-trial (restoration of rights, clerical errors)—counsel declined to move for dismissal.

Grounds for Dismissal (Relief Requested):

• • Cumulative due process violations.
  • Systemic government misconduct and collusion.
  • Prejudice so severe retrial would be unjust and constitutionally insufficient.
  • Legal authorities: US and California Constitution, People v. Batts (2003), Strickland. Washington (4), Caperton v. Massey (2009), Penal Code §§ 96, 96.5, 147, 182.

2023 – Illegal Trial Notes

The Socialogical Dynamics of Communication as Psychological Warfare:

How Tactics Are Used to Discredit, Isolate, Immobilize, Silence and Eliminate

By Kevin Perlman

---

Introduction

Across America, a subtle yet potent form of psychological warfare is unfolding, aimed at ordinary citizens. This campaign of discrediting, immobilizing, and ultimately silencing targets is driven by invasive and manipulative tactics. In my own experience, these methods are not just about harassment — they’re about elimination and eradication at all costs.

---

A System of Control and Privacy Violations

These tactics are deeply rooted in privacy violations. Since childhood, I have been subjected to surveillance, manipulation, and setups and frame jobs — starting as early as five years old, when my own family began framing me as “crazy.” My brother Jason Perelman, told to provoke me while playing victim, was part of this from the beginning. By the time I was in school, neighbors, friends, and even strangers were drawn into the harassment and terror network.

Since 2001, the escalation became undeniable. At Signet-e Services, my own business, I confronted my business partner Mike Huntley about the privacy violations I was seeing. Instead of denying it, he lashed out, admitting:

“Mike, what the hell is going on”

• “World of Paranoia”
• “We are using the judicial system against you.”
• “You are too out of control for California.”
• “You had better live a careful life.”
• “It’s your behavior.”

At first I thought his words were a sick joke. But the attacks never stopped. That was when I realized he was serious — and the mask had come off.

---

Methods of Weaponizing Speech and Privacy

This is how the cycle works:

• Ideas of Reference and Guilting: Private information is used to imply “we know what you did” without directly accusing you.
• Invasive Surveillance: Illegal surveillance tools — such as trojans, phone tapping, and location tracking — are used to collect data and spread it to participants.
• Setting Traps for Communication: If you confront them, they deny everything or accuse you of paranoia: “We never said that.” Or pretend they are afraid of you and spew out disinformation that you are dangerous. They are a schizophrenic. They suffer from mental illness and need to get help.
• Group Coordination: Attacks are repeated endlessly by groups — whistling in unison, asking the same rehearsed questions, or mirroring words back to me. And thousands of other tactics on these psychological terror levels clearly developed by the psychology community in unison with the police and government agencies.

The point is always the same: provoke, isolate, and destroy.

---

From Harassment to Direct Violence

Once surveillance and labeling were in place, the harassment escalated into direct physical attacks and violent setups — carried out by neighborhood watch groups, Starbucks employees, private security companies, businesses, anonymous strangers, and worldwide mass mobs. These operations were coordinated and protected by LAPD, the psychology community, the judicial system, and anyone tied into the original cover-up. Those who don’t want the truth of what was started from the beginning to ever come to light continue to protect it by force.

Examples include:

• Starbucks & Security Guard Assault
Starbucks fabricated countless lies against me, then tried to force me to sign corporate falsifications. When I documented the fraudulent paperwork with photos, I was physically attacked by security guard John Paul Naranjo (Boyd’s & Associates) — seven punches to the back of the head, showing clear motive to kill. He likely was even paid by LAPD and Starbucks, since he technically worked for the shopping center, not Starbucks directly.

Their lies included claiming I was “trying to start fights” — when in reality, it was their own employees, associates, and even customers endlessly provoking me. This began on my very first visits to Starbucks in 2004 and has continued ever since, with worldwide support. The same harassment follows me in coffee shops and businesses everywhere I go — almost minute by minute.

Racist and bigoted comments like “Your kind” reveal the discriminatory motives behind these setups. These weren’t random incidents — they were clearly organized operations. LAPD has covered up these crimes by flipping the narrative, trying to claim I am “making them stalk me.”

---

• Garrett A Starbucks Employee (2005) – Topanga and Ventura, Woodland Hills, Ca

Working with The Police, Psychology Community, Starbucks, Coffee bean and all coffee shops, businesses, and public places WORLDWIDE in a joint eradication operation

Around 2005, during my early visits to Starbucks when I was simply trying to get fresh air and relax, an employee named Garrett looked at me and said: “It’s your transgressions.” At the same time, I was enduring 10 to 100 harassment events per hour inside and outside the store. Showing the connected events of Coffee Shop Employees working with the Police, Psychology Community, and Worldwide Vigilante Civilians to STALK a 5-year-old.

This wasn’t casual. It was a deliberate tactic — insinuating that I had committed some crime as a child. The purpose was to coerce a false confession and to trick me into believing that the coordinated conspiracy to commit murder against me was justified. In reality, it was nothing more than a cover-up of their ongoing crime spree.

---

• Knife Attack
An attempted stabbing by a girl tied to LAPD is on video. This wasn’t random street violence. It was a staged escalation, meant to frame me as “crazy” or a “public nuisance” so LAPD could cover up what they started when I was a young child.

---

• Drug Dealer Personality Neighbor & K9 Attack (Protected by LAPD)
One neighbor, who acted like a stereotypical “drug dealer/thug personality,” unleashed what appeared to be a trained K9 on me. On video, it looks like a Police K9 unit truck picked up the dog afterward. Even if it wasn’t an official police vehicle, the dog was trained to attack on command.

My very first interaction with this neighbor was him threatening me: “You had better accept what’s going on or it will get a lot worse.” Later, he was caught on video screaming: “You’re a snitch, you’re dead.”

These death threats were his way of telling me I had better accept LAPD’s stalking campaigns designed to have me killed or eradicated. Once again, LAPD refused to take the video or write reports — covering it up with lies, claiming it was my fault for “making” people stalk me.

This same neighbor was also found with a pile of stolen neighborhood mail. I believe this was directly tied to Lead Officer Charles Sean Dinse’s illegal operations. Dinse was running provocation campaigns through Facebook and sending mobs after people like me.

The one common sense question you might want to ask yourself is. When I drove to Topanga Division LAPD Police station and dropped off the stolen mail and reported that after the fact. WHY was LAPD so mad at me for reporting the crime and handing them the mail?

Normally people are told to report crimes. Especially if people are stealing mail to steal corona virus stimulus checks. However like usual, this enraged LAPD more. They were mad “What do you want me to do with this” Showing that they don’t want to do anything that shows I’m not the person they’ve been spewing to the World.

Another one of his victims, Rex Shellenberger, Federally sued Dinse and the City of Los Angeles for destroying his reputation nationwide as part of these Nazi-style agendas to create a so-called ‘perfect world.’

And what was Shellenberger’s “crime”? Sleeping in his car. Dinse tried to force him into a mental institution the same way he tried with me — by forging signatures, while riling up global Facebook mobs to stalk him for it.

I also received indirect death threats from Dinse himself, delivered through stalking neighbors. He made it clear that I wasn’t “allowed” to leave my house. After one setup attempt with his criminal neighborhood watch armies, I was taking a walk at a public park. A neighbor called Dinse, then approached me to provoke me verbally until Dinse arrived. When I refused to react, Dinse told me: “Go home.” Not “Can you leave the park for now” — but go home. Later, when he saw me at another public location, he sneered: “I thought I told you to go home.”

The message was clear: my house was my jail cell. I wasn’t allowed out. Dinse and his racist, bigoted mobs had turned my life into the equivalent of a concentration camp in Nazi Germany.

Dinse also tried to dictate what I was “allowed” to do with my life. If your read between the lines what is really going on, and what my family is doing to CONTROL me with them, they claim coffee creates anxiety, so I wasn’t “allowed” to drink coffee. This is supposedly for me. To keep me healthy. He implied I couldn’t pursue studio photography because he deemed it “illegal.”

He with Officer Toro, Encino Starbucks with Dr Alex Lazar, “If you ever take a picture of a person I will exercise the law in my own way” For getting into Studio Photography.

If he disagreed with anything I did, he simply built larger neighborhood watch armies to fabricate lies and mob me to death. Dozens of these stalking setups, frame jobs, and provocations have been captured on video.

Internal Affairs repeatedly covered up for Dinse, watering down my reports and reframing everything to make me look “crazy” or “hypersensitive,” while ignoring the very real stalking, attacks, and death threats.

Dinse is even on video during break-in attempts at my home, along with other setup attempts with neighborhood watch groups. In one case, members of what I call the “Dinse Klan” tried to manipulate me into harassing a homeless person in a park bathroom to set me up. I walked away, letting them know they were on video trying to set me up. The next day, Dinse came over trying to figure out how to arrest me anyway and with his police officer buddies posing as FBI agents Impersonating FBI agents. Federal Crime. Because they couldn’t manipulate me into committing crimes, LAPD and their Nazi armies only grew angrier. And with my family.

---

• Bailey Bernard
Bailey Bernard stalked me, followed me home, and physically assaulted me — under LAPD orders. Despite clear evidence, LAPD protected him in court. Prosecutors working with Dinse perjured themselves, and judges supported it. Judicial lies claimed I “never called the police,” even though I had records proving I did and I personally went down to the station. This shows how deeply the judicial system has been corrupted to shield perpetrators while continuing the campaign against me.

---

• Police Threats
Officers openly threatened me, saying directly: “We’re watching you, Perelman.” These weren’t rumors — the threats were caught on video. This proves law enforcement has been monitoring and stalking me since I was five years old.

---

• Setups in Jail
When I was incarcerated multiple times — illegal arrests staged to attack my credibility and cover up their 48-year stalking campaign — the harassment didn’t stop. It escalated. Charges were falsified, reversed, or manufactured — just like the Starbucks Defamation and slander with never ending attacks. Inside jail, inmates and officers staged provocations nonstop. Everyone already knew who I was before I even arrived.

The provocations were continual and systematic, proving that the psychological warfare extended into every environment — even jail — and that the targeting was coordinated across all levels of the system to figure out how to eradicate me and make me disappear.

---

Conclusion

These are just a few examples of a 48-year campaign of nonstop operations — harassment escalating into direct violence — all protected under the same corrupt umbrella of law enforcement, psychology, and the judicial system. As it is designed to do until the target is either dead or gone from day one.

---

Methods of Weaponizing Speech, Names, and Privacy

These tactics are progressive, exponential, and obsessive with 1000’s of these types of tactics from verbal harassment, visual, audible:

• Whistling in Mass – coordinated groups whistling endlessly.
• Patterned Cars – sequential pairs (Example, 2 of same colors, 2 of same cars, 2 backwards or same colors as backwards, people told to do things to you in 2’s or mimics with 2 people. Maybe 2 green jeep Cherokees parked together, or other various patterned groupings and tactics).
• Cars Parked But Not Driven – used as intimidation signals. With Idea Of Reference Messages. Example, if you go to the beach and do a scenic photoshoot. When you come home you might see 2 Toyota camelry’s together. Which usually grow exponentially after this point.
• Mass Repetition of Greetings – Asking “How you doing?” Response “… Good, good.” And 1000’s of other tactics like this.
• Verbal Mirroring – a phrase like “Alrighty Then” doing Jim Carry Jokes on Social Networks will have worldwide groups in repetition saying “Alrighty” at every business, sometimes 5 times in a couple of minutes
• If you fix something a business screwed up that they were was pretending to be incompetent. Like they couldn’t change a spark plug correctly, INTENTIONALLY doing so. Business Employees worldwide will keep calling you “Boss” this will be repeated worldwide, forever. And exponentially get worse for each tactic. An idea of reference, insinuation or inuendo from random stranger who aren’t supposed to be connected to that person or location to try to create the appearance of schizophrenia.
• Copycat Tactics Worldwide – instantly replicated across states, businesses, and countries. Things I say, Gestures, Things I buy like hats, shirts, Phrases, Jokes. From Stranger to stranger when they see me. A lot of times with angry eye contact.
• Fabricated Conversations – Starbucks and LAPD with Worldwide Strangers, no matter where I am. Spreading as many lies, and disinformation as possible. And worldwide. This information instantly goes Worldwide as each new daily lie is created. A cover up, of a cover up, of a cover up, daily all the way down to 5 years old. There is no method of addressing the lies. And the source is masked so that you can’t defend yourself even with a dialog to state they are fabrications. It is designed to create angry mobs to kill with no resource for survival.
• Traps in Reporting – speaking or staying silent both used as evidence. The situation is ideally created to be a catch 22. Your dammed if you do and dammed if you don’t. Because the MOTIVE was there from day one.
• Names as Weapons – Rhoda → Rodie → Michael → Huntley → my middle name. Idea of reference name association triggers. To create the appearance of Mental Illness or Schizophrenia.
• Glamorizing the Situation – Trying to make the target think that this is for him, or people are just teasing and he is too sensitive, or try to make the target look like he suffers from Delusions of grandeur or thinks differently then others so they can try to justify a conspiracy to commit murder, or brainwash the target into thinking what they are doing is acceptable, normal, his fault, or acceptable to do. Trying to get him to accept his demise.

Even every piece of artwork all the way down to 5 year old was twisted — my mother, an art therapist, and others kept claiming it was a “confession of guilt.” Strategic methods to build angry Psychology Mobs with Worldwide Enraged Psychotic, Civilian hate armies.

Once a tactic starts, it never stops. Once the lie is created, they never let go, they keep building larger and larger stalking groups.

---

Manipulating Civilians, Families, and Psychiatry

At first, my mother had a list of psychiatrists prepared to ambush me. Once I understood and wanted to expose it, the psychology community wanted me dead.

• Dr. Nathalie Krah: “If you don’t take medication, you will destroy your life.” Said in anger, not concern.
• Stalkers following you to public locations then claiming you are stalking them: In my case countless models, pornstars, and other various predators. Stalking, and playing victim.
• Dr. Alex Lazar (office next to Starbucks, Encino): As I mention that Mike Huntley was stating that I was filled with Anger and Rage, Telling Dr Alex Lazar that my family is stalking me with their groups because they feel that their 5-year-old is filled with anger and rage projecting on their child, His eyes shifted in guilt looking down at the floor. He then shifted gears from being a psychiatrist to a corrupt police officer to cover it all up. I also mentioned the Persian Stalking groups with Tom Farley at Coffee Bean on Ventura and Corbin, now known as Paulinas. And the stalking groups linking to my father Persian chiropractor Piam Shiam. In Golden State Sports Medical Lashing out in anger and rage at me. He said “I’m Persian”

His gears shifted to cover it all up as he interrogated me about photography and meeting women, instead of helping solve the problem for my health. Working with LAPD Officer Toro at Encino Starbucks on havehurst and Ventura, he threatened: “If you ever take a picture of a person, I will exercise the law in my own way.”

This Starbucks location with a customer army was working on me with upwards of 1000 attacks per day with these no Relaxing for you Nigger Death threats and the Chess Club. Every Single Time there, just like every other place Worldwide since finding out. This went on at this location alone for something like 5 years and still today no matter where I go and relax.

After this, the harassment multiplied — thousands of attacks per day at Starbucks Encino and even a nationwide shift to backwards parking in coordinated patterns. Remember that these are a few example of what is 1000’s of different types of psychological warfare tactics done to me Worldwide exponentially growing since I was 5 years old.

This is also the location the stalking Chess Club followed me to. In anger and rage with the “No Relaxing for you Nigger” Death threat Worldwide Black Community groups. Because Ariana, the black model contacted me around 2004. Off Facebook wanting me to do a Photoshoot. The final green screen composite was on a Chess Board.  Her then wanting to go to PF Changs and INTERROGATE ME, to try to make me look crazy. Also hinting about the Mike Tyson Composite with Chun Li at University of Colorado. And was never interested in actual artistic creations for her future. But was STALKING. With Aubrey Fisher. Who followed me to the same Starbucks in Encino with the Chess Club. And Alex Lazar. Then Chess Club then moved to the Starbucks in Topanga and Gault. Most likely working on Psychological Angles with Christina Stahlinsky telling me to read Atlas Shrugged and closer to my house in more Starbucks and Customer STALKING operations to Eradicate and Kill at all costs. Officer Toro, Encino Starbucks “If you ever take a picture of a person  I will exercise it in my own way” because someone doesn’t want their child involved in photography with women. Which has nothing to do with Legality.

---

Beyond Psychiatry: Toward Eradication

These operations are not about help. They are about elimination — conspiracy to commit murder, coerced suicide, or permanent incarceration. For me, it has meant decades of setups, cover-ups, and threats.

---

A Personal Reality

Since age five, I have lived this reality — lies, disinformation, attacks, and cover-ups. Much is on video.

The tactic never changes:

• Get the target to talk.
• Use his words against him.
• Escalate to violence or disappearance.

Even Chief Michael Moore of LAPD admitted this exists, though he tried to downplay it. Our dialogue consists of children being monitored once the parents call the police on their child. As his definition of monitoring is very different then what they are really doing with their mental illness watch lists and community stalking operations. Especially with their head thug, Lead Officer Charles Sean Dinse and his new order Nazi regime, to eradicate the inferior race. Those who are “homeless” or have “Mental Illness” there is no middle ground. To them, only the superior race is allowed to roam the earth out of cages.

---

Why It’s Called Gang Stalking

• It is progressive (whispers → attacks).
• It is exponential (tactics multiply).
• It is obsessive (never-ending, like a stalking murderer).

This is not harassment. It is organized psychological warfare. And a persistent hunt to execute you or remove you from society at all costs until they get what they want.

---

Legal Violations and Applicable Codes

The following incidents are not just harassment — they are direct violations of state and federal law.

• Starbucks / John Paul Naranjo: Assault & Battery (PC §§240–242); Conspiracy (PC §182); 18 U.S.C. §241.
• Starbucks employees working with mobbings customer groups in attacks at every location worldwide whichever one I go to as well as other coffee shops, and businesses. And refusal to stop.
  • Starbucks-Related Crimes and Statutory Violations
  • A. CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS
  • 1. Stalking, Harassment, and Mobbing
  • Penal Code § 646.9 — Stalking
  • – Pattern of employees and customers willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly harassing or following you at multiple Starbucks locations.
    
    
  • Penal Code § 653m — Harassing Communications
  • – Verbal, electronic, or written harassment occurring within (or connected to) Starbucks, including repeated, unwanted contact.
    
    
  • Penal Code § 422 — Criminal Threats
  • – Any threats made by employees or customer groups which instill fear for your safety.
    
    
  • Penal Code § 646.9 — Organized Stalking (Gang Stalking)
  • – If action is part of a group, persistent, coordinated campaign.
  • 2. Conspiracy and Group Coordination
  • Penal Code § 182 — Criminal Conspiracy
  • – Two or more Starbucks employees, customers, or third parties conspiring to harass, stalk, or intimidate you.
  • Penal Code § 31 — Aiding and Abetting
  • – Employees (or managers) who knowingly assist or facilitate mobbing/harassment.
  • 3. Civil Rights Violations / Hate Crimes
  • Penal Code § 422.6 — Interference with Civil Rights (Hate Crimes)
  • – If actions are motivated by race, ethnicity, disability, or other protected class.
    
    
  • Civil Code § 51, § 51.7 — Unruh Civil Rights Act
  • – Protects the right to enjoy all business establishments (like Starbucks) without discrimination, violence, intimidation, or harassment by staff or other patrons.
  • 4. Police Involvement / Abuse of Authority
  • Penal Code § 149 — Assault/Battery Under Color of Authority
  • – If police direct, encourage, or cover up mobbing/harassment inside or outside Starbucks.
    
    
  • Penal Code § 136.1 — Intimidation of Victims/Witnesses
  • – If Starbucks (or police) intimidate or retaliate against you for reporting.
    
    
  • Penal Code § 118.1 — False Police Reports
  • – If police or employees generate false reports or statements as part of these actions.
  • B. CALIFORNIA CIVIL VIOLATIONS
  • Civil Code § 1708.8 — Invasion of Privacy/Stalking
  • – Intrusion into your personal peace, surveillance, or repeated unwanted approach.
  • Civil Code § 43, § 1708 — Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED)
  • – Coordinated mobbing, false rumors, or psychological harm.
  • Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code § 51, § 51.7)
  • – Specific to public accommodation—failure by Starbucks to stop coordinated harassment or violence is a civil rights violation.
  • C. FEDERAL CRIMES AND CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
  • 18 USC § 241 — Conspiracy Against Rights
  • – Starbucks employees or management, in coordination with others (especially if police-involved), conspiring to threaten or intimidate you and prevent your full enjoyment of public accommodations.
  • 18 USC § 242 — Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
  • – If police (directly or indirectly) order or encourage Starbucks personnel to engage in unlawful conduct.
  • 18 USC § 245 — Interference with Federally Protected Activities
  • – Interference with your right to patronize (enter, remain at, or use) Starbucks as a public accommodation.
  • 18 USC § 2261A — Interstate Stalking
  •  

• Garrett (2005):
  • A Starbucks employee, during or just before coordinated group “gangstalking” attacks by other employees and customers, states “it’s your transgressions.”
  • The implication is you are being stalked and targeted (with LAPD involvement or knowledge) because you supposedly committed some “crime”—even if you have not.
  • Legal Analysis & Relevant Codes
  • 1. Stalking and Harassment (PC §646.9, §653m)
  • Repeated harassment, surveillance, and provocation—especially in a coordinated manner across locations—fits California Penal Code §646.9 (Stalking) and §653m (Harassing Communications).
  • The phrase “it’s your transgressions” is an attempt to justify ongoing harassment.
  • 
    2. Conspiracy (PC §182)
    
    
  • When multiple people (employees, customers, and potentially LAPD) have a shared plan to target, monitor, and harass you, this can rise to criminal conspiracy under California Penal Code §182.
  • 
    3. Color of Authority and Civil Rights Violations
    
    
  • If the actions are done with LAPD’s knowledge, direction, or protection, this can implicate:
  • – PC §149—Assault or battery under color of authority.
    – 18 USC §242—Federal deprivation of rights under color of law.
    – 18 USC §241—Conspiracy against rights.
  • 4. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (Civil)
  • Coordinated workplace and community efforts to harass, shame, or intimidate you—especially justified on “transgressions”—fit the definition of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED).
  • 
    5. Defamation or False Light
    
    
  • Publicly asserting that you committed a crime to third parties (especially if false and part of a campaign) may be grounds for defamation (libel/slander) or “false light” invasion of privacy, creating significant civil liability.
  • 
    6. Witness Intimidation/Retaliation (PC §136.1, Federal)
    
    
  • If any part of their campaign is designed to keep you from reporting, testifying, or complaining to authorities—including police, corporate authorities, or the courts—this could constitute witness intimidation or retaliation.

• Knife Attack: Assault with a Deadly Weapon (PC §245); Obstruction (PC §148); 18 U.S.C. §242.
• Drug Dealer Neighbor (K9): Assault (PC §§240–243); Theft (PC §484); 18 U.S.C. §241.
• Bailey Bernard: Battery (PC §242); Obstruction (PC §148); 18 U.S.C. §1503.
• Mike Huntley: Criminal Threats (PC §422); Conspiracy (PC §182); 18 U.S.C. §241.
• Rodie Morales: Conspiracy (PC §182); 18 U.S.C. §241.
• Kelly Hatch: Conspiracy (PC §182); Fraud; 18 U.S.C. §241.
• Jason Perelman: Conspiracy (PC §182); 18 U.S.C. §241.
• Dr. Nathalie Krah: Criminal Threats (PC §422); 18 U.S.C. §242.
• Dr. Alex Lazar: Conspiracy (PC §182); 18 U.S.C. §242; 18 U.S.C. §1512.
• Officer Toro: Criminal Threats (PC §422); 18 U.S.C. §242.
• LAPD (Moore, Dinse, etc.): Obstruction (PC §148); Conspiracy (PC §182); 18 U.S.C. §§241–242; Civil RICO.
• Systemic Tactics: Stalking (PC §646.9); Harassment (PC §653m); 18 U.S.C. §241; 18 U.S.C. §1951 – Hobbs Act.

⚖️ Summary: From family to Starbucks to LAPD, every actor is implicated not just in harassment, but in crimes defined by law. These aren’t isolated acts — they form a racketeering-style conspiracy to commit murder.

---

Huntley’s Admissions and Setups

One of the clearest windows into how this system works came through Mike Huntley — who wasn’t just a business partner, but someone sent after me from the start, connected through my brother Jason Perelman’s friend circle when I was 14 at the same time with a Paul Humphrey, Younger Brother of Joe Humphrey is Jason Perelman’s class at Calabasas High School, who actually worked the same security job at the same Starbucks/Shopping center location as John Paul Naranjo of Boyds and Associates Security. Who joined LAPD prior to that. And befriended me stalking me with Mike Huntley for a good 15 years. Paul Humphrey clearly linked to this Starbucks location, and the Security Companies in a Conspiracy to commit murder. Ironically, he lived on Schoenborn St, Canoga Park, CA. Where LAPD Topanga Division opened up in 2009. While trying to frame me with some women on (IRC) Internet Related Chat, and also a girl named Lisa Marie, Jenifer Hess, a Girl named Honey, and many others, from moline, Illinois. On these same Internet Frame job tactics as Mike Huntley.

By 1997, Huntley, along with Anita and Ron Perelman, manipulated me into coming back early from the University of Colorado. By 2001 at Signet-e Services, the mask came off. I had begun noticing clear privacy violations in our office: emails, phone calls, private information surfacing in conversations that no one should have known.

Some of these violations were blatant. Hot Body International website development flows that I had designed were being taken off my computer and dropped onto random AOL screen names — often similar variants of my own — to make it appear that I was responsible for something. Or to try to flip out the target and put him in a paranoid state wondering what is going on to use against him.

On top of that, ICQ chats I had with a girl named Christina Stahlinski from Arizona were being watched. A pool player “friend,” Tim Thompson, mocked me by verbally mimicking what I typed to her — proving surveillance was in play.

Thompson wasn’t just some guy. I allowed him to work in my office, but he had been sent after me by Steve McPike, another pool player friend from Colorado. Thompson lived a contradiction: he himself was tied to Hot Body International and their photographer, immersed in the adult industry. He even manipulated me directly: “We should build adult websites.”While he knew I was building websites for others.

Yet later, in anger, he turned on me: “You built adult websites.” It wasn’t morality. It was entrapment. He wanted to take what he himself was doing and weaponize it against me.

Thompson also referred me to Hustler model Traci Anna Koval. I did build www.TraciAnnaKoval.com, but I didn’t let her reel me in. She was part of setups involving spy cameras in hotel rooms to film Gene Simmons. She wanted me to play a role, but I told her I wanted nothing to do with it.

Meanwhile, trojans had been placed on my computer — allowing outsiders to watch my screen live, take screenshots, even plant files. When I started piecing it together, my computer shut down remotely mid-use — a taunt from those watching me, in unheard of Worldwide, mass groups, through the trojans. Reinforcing Mike Huntley’s Death threats “World of Paranoia”, while he was carrying his threats out with actions.

That information — private data, out-of-context fragments — was fed worldwide. Pornstars like Alexis Amore, Havana Ginger, and countless others with models and worldwide groups parroted the material, fueling worldwide gaslighting campaigns. Around that time, models like Alexis Amore, working for Hot Body International, were most likely following the same patterns—claiming I was “stalking” them. This mirrored what I saw with Tim Thompson, who kept adult DVD covers on his desk and always placed Alexis Amore’s on top, ensuring it caught my attention.

These incidents connect to a much larger network involving Brian Longbotham, Universal Studios, Modern Video Film, property owner Rick Caruso, Starbucks, and many other corporations. Brian Longbotham had been my visual FX supervisor when I landed my first animation job at Modern Video Film after college. After his firing, he sought to befriend me, claiming it was for my technical knowledge and to “make money.” In reality, he was working with organizations to expand these stalking groups, bringing in random corporations or even the City of Thousand Oaks Civic Center, proposing business ideas that doubled as setups, framing attempts, or coordinated harassment on an ever-larger scale.

This was connected directly to Huntley, Bob Sandler, Tim Thompson, and Rodie Morales and many more.

Huntley even rerouted our network switch into the office next door at Golden State Sports Medical — my father’s company, with Patti Googins employed. Later, my father offered me a “can’t miss” Ventura Blvd office deal as Shelly Humphrey’s company moved their company out. It was a trap.

The gym Huntley pushed me into was packed with models and pornstars tied to Morales, the gym manager there, all playing victim in frame jobs. Morales constantly pushed me into strip clubs all over california, mirroring what Val Morozov had done at the University of Colorado in 1995: “Let’s go to strip clubs and make money.”

Even earlier, in 1991, Eric Christianson, working with San Diego Police, pulled the same tricks — stalking, Strip Clubs, and setups while running angles with Jason Perelman.

These operations were synchronized across time and geography. For example, when Morales took me to Adult Con, the very same day Val Morozov — after years of silence — suddenly called me. A seamless coordination.

This isn’t random. It’s the continuation of a 48-year narrative campaign to frame me as unstable and dangerous — when in fact it’s their setups, synchronized and staged, that prove premeditation.

---

Paul Humphrey’s Role and the Layers of Setup

Paul Humphrey was a grade below me at Calabasas High. His older brother, Joe Humphrey, was in my brother Jason Perelman’s class. That’s how Paul first approached me — he acted like he wanted to be friends. For a while, I believed he was.

But the setups started even earlier. At just 8 years old, I kissed a Black girl. That single, innocent moment was twisted into a permanent label: “Kevin is filled with hate and rage. Kevin is racist and antisemitic. Jewish boys don’t kiss Black girls.”

This shows the labels were already being manufactured before the later incident with Jason Gordon. Around the same age, I was manipulated by Robbie Leff into saying something lame about Gordon at the mall. Gordon instantly snapped, going from zero to one hundred, and punched me in the stomach.

Here’s the truth: out of all the billions of scenarios since then where people have lashed out at me in anger, rage, and hate — and the things said and done to me have been a billion times worse than what I said to Jason Gordon — I have never once reacted the way Gordon did. To this day, it remains the only incident in my life where I was the instigator. One imperfection, at 8 years old.

And yet, the psychology community has twisted those childhood moments into lifelong justifications. That single imperfection — things like: kissing a Black girl, mouthing off to Gordon — has been weaponized into the worldwide narrative: “Kevin’s a bully.”

Another one of these justifications came directly from Paul. His personality drove me crazy at times, and occasionally I would vent to others about him. That was turned into a weapon too: “It’s Kevin’s behavior. It’s his personality.” Once again, a meaningless, human detail was manufactured into a permanent worldwide label.

It’s like this: if you’re 10 years old and leave a Coke can on a park bench, suddenly for the rest of your life you’re branded a “litterer.” And from that single Coke can, you now have a planetary murder operation hunting you for 50 years because you “blinked wrong.” Meanwhile, everyone else sees litter everywhere and doesn’t care. That shows it isn’t about the Coke can. It’s personal. It’s about manufacturing judgments to get what they already wanted.

• At 15: “Kevin’s a bully.”
• At 20, in Oregon: “Kevin’s a bully.”
• At 25, in Colorado: “Kevin’s a bully.”
• At 30, in Starbucks, Coffee Bean, restaurants: “Kevin’s a bully.”
• At 53, strangers repeat the same lie: “Kevin’s a bully.”

When that script wears thin, it shifts: “Kevin can’t let go of when he was 8. Kevin suffers from obsession.” Thousands of shifting excuses are rotated through, even absurd ones like “people only own one car” — turning life into a fake mathematical equation, all designed to feed me disinformation, to make me think I must have done something wrong, to push me into accepting being hunted down to be killed.

But anyone who is not psychotic and insane understands that people make mistakes in life. Especially insignificant childhood things that don’t matter. Which shows that my worldwide stalkers know exactly what they are doing.

And here’s the bigger truth: they aren’t questioning me or some supposed moral failing — they already know they are involved in a crime. They have the most private details of my life, distributing them worldwide, and taking them out of context. That alone proves the conspiracy:

• They know the information was obtained illegally.
• They know it was handed to them as a weapon.
• And they know if I ask how they got it, they can’t answer without exposing themselves.

If you press them, they don’t explain — they clam up, get angry, whistle as a death threat, and esculate the mental illness bludgeoning attacks. The argument is never really “Kevin, confess to your crimes.” The real issue is: you were given this information illegally, you know it, and you’re weaponizing it to torture me.

Think about it: in 1982, there was no internet, no pagers, no smartphones. Yet these people had access to the most private details of my life, distributing them worldwide, and throwing them back at me a billion times in “ideas of reference” form. That is not coincidence. That is organized psychological warfare.

This obsession with perfection echoes Adolf Hitler, who demanded absolute perfection and rationalized extermination from even the smallest flaw. My stalkers are doing the same thing: using imperfection as an excuse for hate, rage, insecurity, and fear — while justifying first-degree murder. And, the people telling them to do it, is the Police, Psychology Community, and Government of the United States of America. Bypassing all constitutional and civil rights. Making a person Property. Making a person a slave to be whipped, and put up on crosses to be burned. Or thrown on a train to Auschwitz to go to the showers. But no excuse can justify it. Murder is a crime, no matter what rationalization is invented.

---

Conspiracy to Commit Murder — Penal Codes

• PC 182 – Conspiracy to Commit Murder
• PC 187 – Murder
• PC 664/187 – Attempted Murder

Applied here:

• Conspiracy: Police, psychiatry, family, neighbors, and civilians coordinating.
• Murder: Eradication through suicide, collapse, or setups.
• Attempted Murder: Direct assaults, knife, K9, jail setups, threats.
• Gang Stalking: Relentless psychological attacks until collapse = premeditated murder.

---

Conclusion

This is not history. The daily attacks are still going on. To this day, I endure hundreds to thousands of coordinated provocations every day worldwide.

Golden State Sports Medical and Starbucks became staging grounds. Threats like “No relaxing for you nigger” prove how race, hate, and family ties were weaponized.

Police use civilians as puppets to commit murder for them. Civilians are manipulated, then shielded. It is murder by proxy.

And this is how it grows: one “crazy monster” → two “homeless monsters” → four → eight → sixteen → worldwide armies. Once it becomes the norm, you can’t stop it. Everyone involved is conscious and responsible.

If the world knew the truth, it would flip instantly:
“Kevin is a monster” → “Kevin is a victim of one of the largest psychological warfare and murder conspiracies in U.S. history.”

This would spark worldwide controversy and force accountability.

And it all traces back to me kissing a Black girl at Sunny Skies Day Camp, age 8.

This is rooted in Hitler’s methods — imported into U.S. operations, turning civilians into Nazis.

The only way forward is honesty. Otherwise the U.S. becomes a pseudo-nation like Germany in the 1940s — hiding behind democracy while practicing tyranny and eradication.

The choice is simple: corruption or truth. Chaos or honesty. Tyranny or freedom.

1. Jason Perelman (Brother)
Situation: Manipulation from childhood, provoking, playing victim as part of early harassment.

• Potential Violations:

– Civil: Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED, Civil Code § 43, § 1708)
– Criminal: If part of a larger conspiracy—see PC 182 below.

2. Mike Huntley (Business Partner)
Situation: Admissions of privacy violations, using the judicial system for harassment, direct threats, rerouting network switch for surveillance, organizing psychological attacks.

• Officer Niger of Sandiego Police Department States No Crimes Have Been Committed Against Kevin Perelman:

Police-Related Crimes and Code Violations

1. Threats and Intimidation by Officers

• Incidents: LAPD officers have stated directly, “We’re watching you Perlman.” Police used threats, intimidation, and coordinated harassment (including aggression in jail, collusion with jail staff, and using civilians to provoke you).
• Criminal Codes:

– PC 422 – Criminal Threats
– PC 136.1 – Intimidation of Witness or Victim
– PC 182 – Criminal Conspiracy
– PC 149 – Assault or Battery Under Color of Authority
– PC 236 – False Imprisonment (if detained illegally)
– PC 236.1 – False Imprisonment by Violence or Deceit
– Federal: 18 USC § 242 (Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law)

2. Conspiracy and Coordinated Group Harassment

• Incidents: Coordination with civilians, security guards, and other agencies to harass, provoke, and psychologically damage you. “Gang stalking” operations, both inside and outside jail.
• Criminal Codes:

– PC 182 – Conspiracy (agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime)
– PC 149 – Excessive Force or Assault by Officer
– PC 136.1 – Intimidation (if targeted to prevent reporting or testimony)
– PC 646.9 – Stalking (if part of a repeated harassment campaign)
– PC 653m – Harassing or Threatening Communications
– Federal: 18 USC § 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights)

3. Excessive Force / Assault Under Color of Authority

• Incidents: Physical attacks or setups in jail, police protection of civilians who assault you (e.g., attacks by security and neighbors coordinated/protected by LAPD).
• Criminal Codes:

– PC 149 – Assault/Battery by Peace Officers
– PC 242 – Battery
– PC 245 – Assault with a Deadly Weapon
– PC 240 – Assault
– Federal: 18 USC § 242

4. Cover-Ups and Evidence Tampering

• Incidents: Police covering up civilian assaults, attacks, and setups (e.g., not properly investigating or intentionally destroying evidence).
• Criminal Codes:

– PC 135 – Destroying or Concealing Evidence
– PC 182 – Conspiracy (with others to obstruct justice)
– PC 118.1 – Peace Officer Filing False Report
– Federal: 18 USC § 1519 (Destruction, alteration, falsification of records)

5. Abuse of the Legal Process & Judicial System

• Incidents: Using the judicial system to harass or “set up” the target.
• Criminal Codes:

– PC 182 – Conspiracy (abuse of process)
– PC 134 – Preparing/Offering False Evidence
– PC 132 – Offering False Evidence in Court
– PC 137 – Inducing False Testimony or Fraudulent Documents

6. Involvement in or Facilitation of Civil Rights Violations

• Incidents: Police collaborate in psychological warfare, deprivation of rights, intimidation based on prejudice or bias (race, mental health, etc.).
• Criminal Codes:

– PC 422.6 – Civil Rights Violations (hate crime enhancements)
– Federal: 18 USC § 242 (Color of Law), 18 USC § 241 (Conspiracy against rights), 42 USC § 1983 (civil lawsuits for deprivation of rights by government actors)

7. Protection of Criminal Acts by Civilians

• Incidents: Police shielding individuals who commit assaults, thefts, or stalking against you, and refusing to act on your complaints due to coordinated efforts.
• Criminal Codes:

– PC 32 – Accessory After the Fact (assisting to avoid arrest/prosecution)
– PC 182 – Conspiracy
– PC 149 – Abuse of Authority

8. False Arrest / Unlawful Detention

• Incidents: Any situation where you are detained, arrested, or jailed without probable cause as part of intimidation or harassment.
• Criminal Codes:

– PC 236 – False Imprisonment
– Federal: 42 USC § 1983 (can be used to sue for false arrest or false imprisonment by police)

9. Use of Civilians (“Murder by Proxy”)

• Incidents: Police manipulating or encouraging civilians to commit threats, stalking, or potential violence so that police can avoid direct responsibility.
• Criminal Codes:

– PC 182 – Conspiracy
– PC 187/664-187 – Solicitation or Attempt of Murder (if intent can be proven)

Criminal:
– Penal Code PC 182 (Conspiracy)
– PC 646.9 (Stalking)
– PC 422 (Criminal Threats)
– PC 632 (Illegal recording/eavesdropping)
– PC 502 (Unauthorized computer access/“hacking”)
– PC 422.6 (Civil Rights Violations if hate/bias-motivated)
– Civil:
– IIED, invasion of privacy, Business & Professions Code § 17200 (unlawful business acts)

3. Family Members (Mother, Ron & Anita Perelman)
Situation: Coordinating psychiatric ambushes, supporting false labeling as “crazy,” manipulating healthcare providers.

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal: Conspiracy if coordinating with others (PC 182), possible elder/child abuse statutes if manipulation was abusive.
– Civil: IIED, invasion of privacy, possible defamation

4. Tim Thompson, Steve McPike, Rodie Morales, Bob Sandler, Val Morozov, other business/pool associates
Situation: Surveillance, setups, feeding private info via spyware/trojans, gaslighting, introducing at-risk or illicit contacts, pushing setups in adult industry.

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal:
– PC 182 (Conspiracy)
– PC 530.5 (Identity Theft, if misusing your personal data)
– PC 502 (Computer crimes)
– PC 632 (Eavesdropping)
– PC 647(j)(3) (Secretly recording in hotel or private settings)
– Civil:
– Invasion of privacy, IIED, defamation

5. Traci Anna Koval, and Adult Industry Associates, and Worldwide groups involved
Situation: Involved in setups, surveillance, and worldwide gaslighting via communication networks.

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal:
– PC 182 (Conspiracy)
– PC 502, 632, 647(j)(3) as above
– Civil:
– Invasion of privacy, defamation

6. Brian Longbotham, Universal Studios, Modern Video Film, Rick Caruso, Corporations Asssociated like Starbucks, Coffeebean, Universal Studios, The Thousand Oaks Civics Art Plaza, and Countless Others

Situation: Contributing to the coordination of harassment, amplifying attacks through social/professional networks.

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal:
– If any member actively participated: PC 182 (Conspiracy), contributing to IIED.
– Civil:
– IIED, invasion of privacy, business torts

7. Starbucks Staff & Security (e.g., John Paul Naranjo, Starbucks Encino, Garrett)
Situation: Physical and verbal attacks, staged assaults, provocation, spreading lies and disinformation with LAPD collusion.

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal:
– PC 240, 242 (Assault and battery)
– PC 182 (Conspiracy)
– PC 245 (Assault with a deadly weapon / K9 attack)
– PC 646.9 (Stalking)
– Civil Code § 51.7 (Hate crimes, violence motivated by protected characteristics)
– Civil:
– Assault, battery, false imprisonment, IIED

8. LAPD Officers, Jail Staff, Police Threats
Situation: Threats (“We’re watching you”), setups in jail, orchestrating attacks, aiding cover-ups.

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal:
– PC 182 (Conspiracy)
– PC 149 (Abuse under color of authority)
– 18 USC § 242 (Federal, deprivation of rights under color of law)
– PC 135 (Destroying/concealing evidence)
– PC 136.1 (Witness intimidation)
– Civil:
– Bivens/federal civil rights claims, IIED, false arrest

9. Dr. Nathalie Krah, Dr. Alex Lazar, Psychiatry
Situation: Collusion with law enforcement to discredit you, threats regarding medication, interrogating under false pretenses.

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal:
– PC 182 (Conspiracy, if proven)
– PC 136.1 (Witness/victim intimidation)
– Civil:
– Medical malpractice, IIED, invasion of privacy

10. Bailey Bernard (Stalking and Assault)
Situation: Assault, stalking, protected by LAPD in court.

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal:
– PC 240/242 (Assault/battery)
– PC 646.9 (Stalking)
– PC 182 (Conspiracy, if coordinated)
– Civil:
– IIED, assault, battery

11. Unnamed Neighbors, Civilians
Situation: Ongoing stalking, aggression, coordination with police, psychological harassment (whistling, parked cars, mass repetition, mail theft).

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal:
– PC 182 (Conspiracy)
– PC 646.9 (Stalking)
– PC 350 (Mail theft, if proven)
– PC 602 (Trespassing, if entering property)
– PC 422 (Criminal threats)
– Civil:
– Invasion of privacy, IIED, trespass, nuisance

12. Group Coordination (Gang Stalking, RICO Elements)
Situation: Systematic, orchestrated psychological warfare, involving multiple parties and use of technology, business, and civilian networks.

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal:
– PC 182 (Conspiracy—multiple actors toward an unlawful end)
– RICO statutes (18 USC § 1962 — federal racketeering laws, if criminal enterprise established)
– PC 646.9 (Stalking)
– PC 653m (Harassing phone/electronic communications)
– PC 502 (Computer crimes/Cyberstalking)
– Civil:
– Civil conspiracy, IIED, invasion of privacy, defamation

General Criminal Statutes Referenced:

• PC 182 — Conspiracy to Commit Crime
• PC 187 — Murder
• PC 664/187 — Attempted Murder
• PC 646.9 — Stalking
• PC 240/242 — Assault/Battery
• PC 245 — Assault with Deadly Weapon/K9
• PC 422 — Criminal Threats
• PC 632 — Unlawful Eavesdropping or Recording
• PC 502 — Computer/Data Crimes
• PC 530.5 — Identity Theft
• PC 647(j)(3) — Secret Recording
• PC 149 — Abuse Under Color of Authority
• PC 136.1 — Intimidating a Witness/Victim
• PC 135 — Destroying Evidence
• CIVIL CODE § 1708 — Right to Privacy/IIED

CIVIL CODE VIOLATIONS:

• IIED — Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
• Invasion of Privacy (Civil Code § 1708.8, § 43)
• Defamation (Libel and Slander)
• Civil Conspiracy
• Civil Rights Violations (California Unruh Civil Rights Act, Civil Code § 51, § 51.7)
• Business Torts (if commercial/competitive motives)

Listing of Key Persons, Situations, and Potential Violations

1. Jason Perelman (Brother)
Situation: Manipulation from childhood, provoking, playing victim as part of early harassment.

• Potential Violations:

– Civil: Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED, Civil Code § 43, § 1708)
– Criminal: If part of a larger conspiracy—see PC 182 below.

2. Mike Huntley (Business Partner)
Situation: Admissions of privacy violations, using the judicial system for harassment, direct threats, rerouting network switch for surveillance, organizing psychological attacks.

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal:
– Penal Code PC 182 (Conspiracy)
– PC 646.9 (Stalking)
– PC 422 (Criminal Threats)
– PC 632 (Illegal recording/eavesdropping)
– PC 502 (Unauthorized computer access/“hacking”)
– PC 422.6 (Civil Rights Violations if hate/bias-motivated)
– Civil:
– IIED, invasion of privacy, Business & Professions Code § 17200 (unlawful business acts)

3. Family Members (Mother, Ron & Anita Perelman)
Situation: Coordinating psychiatric ambushes, supporting false labeling as “crazy,” manipulating healthcare providers.

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal: Conspiracy if coordinating with others (PC 182), possible elder/child abuse statutes if manipulation was abusive.
– Civil: IIED, invasion of privacy, possible defamation

4. Tim Thompson, Steve McPike, Rodie Morales, Bob Sandler, Val Morozov, other business/pool associates
Situation: Surveillance, setups, feeding private info via spyware/trojans, gaslighting, introducing at-risk or illicit contacts, pushing setups in adult industry.

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal:
– PC 182 (Conspiracy)
– PC 530.5 (Identity Theft, if misusing your personal data)
– PC 502 (Computer crimes)
– PC 632 (Eavesdropping)
– PC 647(j)(3) (Secretly recording in hotel or private settings)
– Civil:
– Invasion of privacy, IIED, defamation

5. Traci Anna Koval, and Adult Industry Associates and the mass groups taking part

Situation: Involved in setups, surveillance, and worldwide gaslighting via communication networks.

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal:
– PC 182 (Conspiracy)
– PC 502, 632, 647(j)(3) as above
– Civil:
– Invasion of privacy, defamation

6. Brian Longbotham, Universal Studios, Modern Video Film, Rick Caruso, Corporations
Situation: Contributing to the coordination of harassment, amplifying attacks through social/professional networks.

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal:
– If any member actively participated: PC 182 (Conspiracy), contributing to IIED.
– Civil:
– IIED, invasion of privacy, business torts

7. Starbucks Staff & Security (e.g., John Paul Naranjo, Starbucks Encino, Garrett)
Situation: Physical and verbal attacks, staged assaults, provocation, spreading lies and disinformation with LAPD collusion.

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal:
– PC 240, 242 (Assault and battery)
– PC 182 (Conspiracy)
– PC 245 (Assault with a deadly weapon / K9 attack)
– PC 646.9 (Stalking)
– Civil Code § 51.7 (Hate crimes, violence motivated by protected characteristics)
– Civil:
– Assault, battery, false imprisonment, IIED

8. LAPD Officers, Jail Staff, Police Threats
Situation: Threats (“We’re watching you”), setups in jail, orchestrating attacks, aiding cover-ups.

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal:
– PC 182 (Conspiracy)
– PC 149 (Abuse under color of authority)
– 18 USC § 242 (Federal, deprivation of rights under color of law)
– PC 135 (Destroying/concealing evidence)
– PC 136.1 (Witness intimidation)
– Civil:
– Bivens/federal civil rights claims, IIED, false arrest

9. Dr. Nathalie Krah, Dr. Alex Lazar, Psychiatry
Situation: Collusion with law enforcement to discredit you, threats regarding medication, interrogating under false pretenses.

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal:
– PC 182 (Conspiracy, if proven)
– PC 136.1 (Witness/victim intimidation)
– Civil:
– Medical malpractice, IIED, invasion of privacy

10. Bailey Bernard (Stalking and Assault)
Situation: Assault, stalking, protected by LAPD in court.

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal:
– PC 240/242 (Assault/battery)
– PC 646.9 (Stalking)
– PC 182 (Conspiracy, if coordinated)
– Civil:
– IIED, assault, battery

11. Unnamed Neighbors, Civilians
Situation: Ongoing stalking, aggression, coordination with police, psychological harassment (whistling, parked cars, mass repetition, mail theft).

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal:
– PC 182 (Conspiracy)
– PC 646.9 (Stalking)
– PC 422 (Criminal threats)
– Civil:
– Invasion of privacy, IIED, trespass, nuisance

12. Group Coordination (Gang Stalking, RICO Elements)
Situation: Systematic, orchestrated psychological warfare, involving multiple parties and use of technology, business, and civilian networks.

• Potential Violations:

– Criminal:
– PC 182 (Conspiracy—multiple actors toward an unlawful end)
– RICO statutes (18 USC § 1962 — federal racketeering laws, if criminal enterprise established)
– PC 646.9 (Stalking)
– PC 653m (Harassing phone/electronic communications)
– PC 502 (Computer crimes/Cyberstalking)
– Civil:
– Civil conspiracy, IIED, invasion of privacy, defamation

General Criminal Statutes Referenced:

• PC 182 — Conspiracy to Commit Crime
• PC 187 — Murder
• PC 664/187 — Attempted Murder
• PC 646.9 — Stalking
• PC 240/242 — Assault/Battery
• PC 245 — Assault with Deadly Weapon/K9
• PC 422 — Criminal Threats
• PC 632 — Unlawful Eavesdropping or Recording
• PC 502 — Computer/Data Crimes
• PC 530.5 — Identity Theft
• PC 647(j)(3) — Secret Recording
• PC 149 — Abuse Under Color of Authority
• PC 136.1 — Intimidating a Witness/Victim
• PC 135 — Destroying Evidence
• CIVIL CODE § 1708 — Right to Privacy/IIED

CIVIL CODE VIOLATIONS:

• IIED — Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
• Invasion of Privacy (Civil Code § 1708.8, § 43)
• Defamation (Libel and Slander)
• Civil Conspiracy
• Civil Rights Violations (California Unruh Civil Rights Act, Civil Code § 51, § 51.7)
• Business Torts (if commercial/competitive motives)

Summary Table of Police-Related Crimes in Your Case

Police Action	Code Violation(s)
Threats/Intimidation	PC 422, 136.1, 182, 149, 236, Fed 18 USC § 242
Coordinated harassment (Gang Stalking)	PC 182, 149, 646.9, 653m, Fed 18 USC § 241
Excessive force/assault in or out of custody	PC 149, 240, 242, 245, Fed 18 USC § 242
Evidence tampering/cover-ups	PC 135, 182, 118.1, Fed 18 USC § 1519
Judicial process abuse	PC 182, 134, 132, 137
Civil rights deprivations/hate crimes	PC 422.6, Fed 18 USC § 241, § 242, 42 USC 1983
Protecting criminal acts by others	PC 32, 182, 149
False arrest/unlawful detention	PC 236, Fed 42 USC § 1983
Use of civilians for proxy crimes	PC 182, 187, 664/187

Organized Listing By Person, Situation, and Laws Broken:

Person/Entity	Situation	Criminal Codes	Civil Codes/Torts
Jason Perelman	Early manipulation, provocation	PC 182 (if part of conspiracy)	IIED, invasion of privacy
Mike Huntley	Surveillance, threats, privacy violations	PC 182, PC 646.9, 502, 422, 632	IIED, privacy, § 17200
Family (Mother, Ron, Anita)	Psychiatric collusion, labeling	PC 182 (conspiracy), abuse statutes	IIED, privacy, defamation
Tim Thompson, et al.	Computer crimes, setups, gaslighting	PC 182, 502, 530.5, 647(j)(3), 632	IIED, privacy, defamation
Adult Industry Associates	Setups, worldwide smear	PC 182, 502, 647(j)(3), 632	IIED, privacy, defamation
Brian Longbotham & Corp. Network	Professional/personal harassment	PC 182, IIED	IIED, privacy, torts
Starbucks & Security	Assaults, harassment, lies	PC 240, 242, 245, 646.9, 182, 51.7	Assault, IIED, battery
LAPD/Police	Threats, setups, color of law	PC 182, 149, Fed. 18 USC 242, 136.1	Civil rights, IIED
Psychiatrists (Krah, Lazar)	Collusion, threats, manipulation	PC 182, 136.1	Malpractice, IIED, privacy
Bailey Bernard	Stalking, assault	PC 646.9, 240, 242, 182	IIED, assault, battery
Neighbors/Civilians	Stalking, mail theft, group harassment	PC 182, 646.9, 350, 602, 422	IIED, invasion, nuisance
Network/Enterprise (Group Acts)	Gang stalking, cyber, technology-enabled	PC 182, RICO, 646.9, 653m, 502	Civil conspiracy, IIED

My name is Kevin Perelman. I am sharing my story not just to protect myself from ongoing, top-down harassment, but to expose and challenge a system of organized abuse—implemented and orchestrated by law enforcement leaders in Los Angeles—that threatens constitutional, state, and civil rights for all.

A Systematic Campaign, Top-Down

For years, I have been the target of coordinated stalking, intimidation, and vandalism—all part of persistent, organized efforts by so-called “community patrols,” backed by officers of the Los Angeles Police Department, especially through the Topanga Division LAPD, and furthered by actions and proceedings in the Van Nuys Courthouse. From the very top, Chief Michael Moore and lead officer Charles Sean Dinse of the LAPD have overseen and encouraged ongoing “monitoring” campaigns to surveil, isolate, and criminalize people not because of any genuine crime, but instead based on bias, rumor, or personal vendetta.

Crucially, these attacks are not about improving public safety, enforcing self-control, or encouraging lawful behavior.
They are about one thing: permanently removing those they dislike or label as “undesirable” from society—no matter the cost, no matter the harm, and regardless of whether any real wrongdoing has occurred.

Most disturbing is that these operations target not only supposed “troublemakers,” but also children—monitoring and labeling them at a young age, with lifelong consequences. These practices are not about prevention or intervention; they are about discrimination, exclusion, and the destruction of lives and futures for reasons as empty as rumor, nonconformity, or mere dislike.

Threats, Intimidation, and Direct Evidence

My personal experience includes chilling, specific threats and abuse:

• In 2001, Mike Huntley issued multiple death threats: “We are using the judicial system against you,” “Have a good life now,” “You had better live a careful life,” “It’s your behavior,” and “I’ve given you enough rope to hang yourself with.” At the same time, he, in apparent coordination with the LAPD, attempted to plant a trash bag of marijuana in my home in an effort to set me up, frame me, and manufacture felony charges against me.
• Officer Charles Sean Dinse not only participated in these campaigns, but publicly posted about me and others on his Facebook account, rallying the masses in online and real-world harassment. His conduct led to a federal lawsuit (with the City of Los Angeles also named) for inciting and leading this form of mobbing (“doxxing”) against targeted residents.
• LAPD Officer Toro threatened me for working in studio photography with a girl named Aubrey Fisher and my family, telling me: “If you ever take a picture of a person, I will exercise the law in my own way.”
• All the while, officials and officers excused their actions by labeling me “mentally ill” or in need of “fixing.” But in truth, these labels are only a pretext for social erasure and targeted destruction—anyone “different” or simply disliked becomes a target, regardless of their innocence or intentions.

A Global and Nationwide Problem

What is happening in Los Angeles is not the exception. Similar campaigns of organized stalking, surveillance, malicious profiling, and exclusion are being reported in all 50 states and globally. The use of law enforcement, community patrols, and the court system to monitor, provoke, and ultimately expel people based on nothing more than disapproval or discomfort is a growing and deeply troubling phenomenon. Media outlets and advocacy groups have documented these modern-day “purges,” showing that this is about removing people from society—not because they are dangerous, but because someone in power wants them gone.

Legal Codes and Constitutional Violations

These campaigns violate multiple sections of California and federal law:

• California Penal Code § 646.9: Stalking (credible threats, repeated harassment)
• California Penal Code § 422: Criminal threats
• California Penal Code § 182: Criminal conspiracy, including to falsely indict or injure under color of law
• California Penal Code § 118 & § 132: Perjury and false evidence
• California Penal Code § 1385: Authority and obligation for judges to dismiss cases “in the interests of justice”
• Civil Code § 51 (Unruh Civil Rights Act): Guarantees freedom from arbitrary discrimination
• California Constitution Art. I, § 7: Due process and equal protection
• U.S. Constitution, Amendments I, IV, V, VI, XIV
• 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Federal): Civil liability for rights deprivation under color of law
• 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242 (Federal): Criminalizes rights conspiracy and deprivation under color of law

Parallels to Profiling, Intolerance, and Discrimination

This is profiling and marginalization taken to its logical extreme—no longer just about race, class, or so-called “mental health,” but about eliminating anyone who is “different” or simply disliked. Community targeting and exclusion are newer forms of the same old pattern: pretextual claims of “fixing,” “public order,” or “safety” used to justify removing innocent people from their lives, jobs, and communities.

Judicial Duty and the Extensive Authority to Dismiss

Judges—and the judiciary—have both the authority and the duty under California Penal Code § 1385, and constitutional doctrine, to dismiss any case infected by discrimination, abuse, fabricated evidence, or government misconduct. This responsibility is not limited to obvious or overt hateful conduct. It applies just as powerfully where the legal system is being used as a tool for social cleansing, exclusion, or punishment of those who simply are not wanted.

• Dismissal is required wherever prosecution is shown to rest on personal dislike, social bias, or governmental acts of vengeance.
• Judges at the Van Nuys Courthouse and throughout our courts must take affirmative steps whenever there is credible evidence of these abuses—before, during, and after trial.
• The law and legal precedents demand that no person should be railroaded into conviction, social exile, or loss of liberty, or extermination simply because of who they are or whom certain officials dislike.

Call for Accountability and Global Vigilance

Organized harassment, exclusion, and social destruction are a global issue—and their roots are not lack of self-control by the accused, but a system that allows those in power to remove people, at all costs, whom they simply wish to see gone. We must not allow our public institutions to become weapons of discrimination. Dismissal is not just a legal technicality; it is the last safeguard for fairness, dignity, and our collective future.

I share my story for myself and for everyone facing removal, exclusion, or unjust prosecution wherever they live. Only by demanding accountability and by using every available legal check—starting with regular, meaningful judicial dismissal—can we put an end to this culture of removal and restore justice to our society.

Thank you for listening, for believing, and for standing up for human dignity and true justice.

Sincerely,
Kevin Perelman

https://rumble.com/v66xu0v-russell-silber-1-mph-bumper-tap-claiming-this-has-destroyed-his-life.html

https://rumble.com/v66ydvv-russel-silber-and-me-trading-insurance-information-and-dialogue-however-not.html

Russel Silber and Me Trading Insurance information and Dialogue – However not audible – Russel got extremely angry when I went through insurance and not under the table while waiting for me to leave

Russel Seems to be walking around just fine with his Metro Mile insurance he didn’t want to use, in this video, I don’t see any ambulance’s coming while he’s supposedly in Critical Condition with his buddy Lead Officer Charles Sean Dinse working with him in his 48 year WORLDWIDE crime spree against me while he’s hiring a dirtball Lawyer to sue my insurance for these medical injuries he claims he has because he doesn’t want to work for a living

This is no coincidence, Dr Steve Levinson, Who followed me to the Car Enthusiast Groups, In Burbank Ca, Befriending me with his FRIEND Ralph who likes to sue drivers in Personal Injury cases for a living. PRETENDING their group of MONEY STEALING STALKERS, are victims.

Oddly enough, is the same AGE and INDUSTRY as DR Ronald Berry Perelman who has been PAYING OFF THE POLICE, and STALKING and hunting me since 5 years old. An Orthopedic Surgeon with a secondary PSYCHOLOGY DEGREE

Steve’s friend RALPH has conversation after conversation how he collects on this Personal Injury Cases to make a living. With fake ACCIDENTS as they befriend me with their THREATS linking to Armenian groups involved in several AUTO CRIMES, and Insurance Fraud

The Fact that Russel at the time of this appeared to be wearing fake looking, Austin Powers teeth when I got out of my car. Oddly Enough Everyone knows I was joking around with similar jokey gimmicky teach, showing that I have a sense of humor and their LIES that I’m a violent paranoid schizophrenic are just that. A kill the 5 year old jewish child JUSTIFICATION. Even though you can’t really Justify a Conspiracy to commit murder, or Solicitation to commit murder or Eradicate. Each individual I meet does for the last 50 years. Pretending it’s a game and a Joke while my mother and LAPD tell me I’m Donald Trump and need to behave like the President of the United States. And odd unheard of rhetoric like this.

When getting out in his FLUSTERED ANGRY STATE. Babbling things like don’t try to Lawyer me, and This is how we do it in NEW YORK. He wanted to go under the Table, and not go through my Insurance.

Instantly Red Flags arose in my brain something was very wrong with this character. Who called me on the phone “Your the guy” As if this 1 MPH 50/50 bumper tap is the end of the world. As we all know it will cost $150 for a new plastic bumper, about %100 for a new tail lamp, and about $400 to paint it. And padding the Auto Bodyshop bill would be about $1000 tops. On parts build to be replaced in minutes.

USAA paid him probably double or even triple this.

This is now isolated incident, as this says everything anyone needs to know about these STALKING GROUPS trying to create the appearance of MENTAL ILLNESS, Recklessness, Lies I’m a Public Nuisance, to ERADICATE ME, at all costs and lock me away with LAPD and their childhood HATE ARMIES started by my own family in HATE and RAGE for their 5 year old. Leaving now BREATHING ROOM for anything but to be HUNTED to be KILLED or ERADICATE by the masses of anonymous strangers for the last 50 years.

This is going through, Once Again, VAN NUYS courthouse. Judge Michael R Amerian. An Armenian Judge. While I have no problems with Armenians. There was an Armenian Groups in the Auto Conspiracy and car Groups Stalking me since 16 with Dr Ronald Berry Perelman, Mad at me for getting into the next hobby. And JoJo’s Automotive Auto Bodyshop, an Armenian Auto Group is probably trying to cover up their Insurance Fraud Operations trying to get me to sign USAA Paperwork to Double Charge them which I wouldn’t take part in.

Jojo’s Automotive tried to manipulate me in signing USAA paperwork to try to Double Charge them in my name. I obviously didn’t sign it. They also refused to fix the car correctly sabotaging things on it. And making panels incorrectly, Threatening me, No ones going to fix it. With their JEW HATE groups. I was met by angry Armenians trying to cover this up at the Car Shows or Social Events.

But remember, these situations happen at every place and venue. Gyms, Pool Halls, Coffee Shops, Parks, Restaurants, Dating, Colleges, High School, Elementry School. Almost every business WORLDWIDE in a mass INTERNET based terror, Torture, KILL, Eradicate conspiracy with INSTANT lines of communication. Right to whereever I live and angry mobs of Neighbors with the Police HUNTING to Setup, Frame, Eradicate, or KILL.

Daily, Minute by minute, ongoing for 48 years now. As I find out at 29 years old. With Mike Huntley’s DEATH THREATS. “World of Paranoia”, “We are using the JUDICIAL SYSTEM against you”, “Have a good life now”, “You had better live a careful life” While dropping papers on my desk how to make people mentally ill and kill them. many other statements DEFINING the 50 year situation going on daily minute by minute WORLDWIDE.

These HATE attacks increased at the Car Groups. Once Steve Levinson showed up linking to my Father. With his, Your kind doesn’t leave his cage. Just like when he was putting Shock Collars on his dogs, and keeping them in cages for no reason when I was growing up.

Dr Steve Levinson from a Judicial Family befriending me with his Insurance fraud Friend Ralph seems to be related in illegal operations to try to Set me up, frame me, or lock me away while stealing all my money, and running my name through the mud to stop the TRUTH from coming to light about something much bigger.

Because this isn’t about MONEY, it’s about KILLING or ERADICATION. And money is secondary. As it has not stopped for 50 years jumping from one group to the next DAILY.

Since Dr Steve Levinson is a Medical Docter my fathers age, in my fathers circles. Dr Ronald Berry Perelman.
Who has been STALKING ME, in ANGER and RAGE even in 1988 for getting into the Car Hobby with his PSYCHOTIC PERFECTIONIST NAZI personality and his Police and Judicial Friends

Also, it should be noted that Van Nuys Court House, just like the rest are fully aware of these ERADICATION operations. As I’ve been countlessly PROVOKED by them, in these EXTERMINATION operations. 3 ILLEGAL ARRESTS and Trials where the Judges, Defense Attorneys, Prosecutors, District Attorneys, not only didn’t think was WRONG. They are fully supporting and trying to COVER IT ALL UP!

Showing that Dr Ronald Berry Perelman was paying off the JUDICIAL SYSTEM and POLICE when I was a young child with his Ch!ld R@pist activities to HUNT and KILL or ERADICATE is his 5 year old he HATES so much with the rest of my family and their WORLD OF CH!LD R@PIST armies hunting me all day and night trying to PROVOKE to DEATH to push out of control to Arrest with their Ch!ld R@pist buddy police officers like Lead Officer Charles Sean Dinse out of pure HATE and RAGE for a 5 year old Jewish Child.

Which they keep lying saying nothing is going on.
Judge Michael R Amerian is the next Judge inline of these CRIMINAL LAPD Activities with the Psychology Community. I have not met one Lawyer or Judge, Especially in Van Nuys Court House willing to be HONEST about these conspiracies, setups, frame jobs, provoking’s in mass WORLDWIDE groups.

Just odd Statements from LAPD Officers refusing to file police reports telling me I’m Donald Trump. Just like the Mike Huntley statements that I’m the President in 2001 when he was trying to Plant a Trashbag of Police Confiscated Marijuana in my house with my father and Rodie Morales he had befriend me.

And 25 years minute by minute, were going to KILL or ERADICATE you, and you don’t talk are we are going to KILL or ERADICATE you. And since Debbie Woolman, Court Reporter in Van Nuys courthouse OWN a 26 year empty townhouse adjoining the wall to the Townhouse I own.

And we are now on Judge Michael R Amerian who is Armenian. You can do your own homework and research these criminal activities and operations. And what is really going on instead of the LAPD worldwide Lies, and PROPAGANDA to build WORLDWIDE Ch!ld R@pist armies to hunt me to have me KILLED or ERADICATED in unheard of methods that originate from ADOLF HITLER himself. Used by the Perelman family and their Police and Judge Friends to hunt their 5 year old with a Planet of Ch!ld R@ping Sickos. In LAPD Neighborhood Watch groups. Told to HUNT and KILL or ERADICATE out of Pure Hate and rage.

And Lead officer Charles Sean Dinse blasting his LIES on his FACEBOOK account in which he was FEDERALLY SUED for building HATE ARMIES against others
What is LAPD trying to cover up across 48 years with their Ch!ld R@pist Armies? Why is the information in my brain something they are hunting me to KILL over with the masses?

What is this Harmless Bumper Tap, the Russel Silber was waiting for me to time things how they wanted, really about? And why does it link into similar daily activities just like this for 48 years? Since 5 years old?

This is not about money, it’s about EXTERMINATION or ERADICATION

www.KevinPerelmanTarget.com
www.TheHateCage.com

Teaser – Documenting University of Colorado Crime Spree against me On the way back from buying the Corvette all the Auto Shops were told to destroy!

Do you really think this is because a car is 96 decipals instead of 95 decipals, that their is a WORLDWIDE murder operation to have me KILLED since I was 5 years old? What are the Auto Shops trying to Cover up with Pineapple Joe from Hawaii Racing in 1988 with my father Dr Ronald Berry Perelman. As random strangers with LAPD are told to tell me to go KILL MY FATHER. To try to cover up their 51 year MURDER operations still going on Minute by Minute to have me KILLED?

Or do you think there is a little more something to a Planet of Child R@pists hunting me to have me KILLED trying to make me look like a VIOLENT PARANOID SCHIZO since I was 5 years old?

While trying to get me to go after people to cover up their WORLDWIDE Murder Operations and their mental illness attacks Bludgeonings with an entire planet which are 100K to 1 million mental blows per day to bash my skull in and KILL me since I was 5 years old. Sanctioned by the Psychology Community, NSA/FBI and Government Organizations.

In FLAG and KILL operations to hunt and KILL those they don’t like or trust. Violating all CONSTITIONALITY. Making no US citizen SAFE in the United States of America!

As you question WHY random strangers would be HUNTING a 5 year old for 51 years now! For no actual reason but SUPPORTING Child R@pist Jew Killers!

As Gang Stalking was ORIGINATED from a man named ADOLF HITLER. And used by the UNITED STATES Government of America to KILL those they don’t like or TRUST!

While contacting and paying off COUNTLESS people, and women to hunt me to have me KILLED since I was 5 years old

http://www.KevinPerelmanTarget.com